| |
|
| Recent
Driving Under
the Influence
Verdicts |
|
|
Sandy
Springs
On July
1, 2006,
the Sandy
Springs
Police
Department
began
operations. There
is a notable
increase
in police
presence
in this
area formerly
patrolled
by the
Fulton
County
Police
Department. The
Sandy Springs
Municipal
Court is
in full
swing at: 7840
Roswell
Road, Building
500, Sandy
Springs,
GA 30530. Jail
cases
are currently
being
heard
at the
Roswell
Municipal
Court.
Senate
Bill
502
In 2005,
SB 502
was introduced
and passed
in the
Georgia
Senate. The
Bill
recodifies
the entire
Driving
Under
the Influence
(DUI)
statute
and enacts
a couple
of significant
changes.
The
first
change
deals
with
refusal
to submit
to the
state
administered
chemical
test. In
the past,
if a
person
refused
testing,
no test
was sought
by law
enforcement. Under
the new
statute, “if
the person
refuses
to submit
to the
state
administered
test
authorized
by this
Code
section,
nothing
in this
article
shall
be deemed
to preclude
the acquisition
or admission
of such
evidence
by any
means
authorized
by the
Constitution
of laws
of this
state
or of
the United
States.” Proposed
Section
40-5-202(f). This
new section
may allow
officers
to collect
blood
without
the consent
of the
party “acquisition” and
allow
it to
be used
in court. If
passed,
this
Section
would
certainly
be challenged
in the
courts.
The
second
change
alters
the Implied
Consent
warning. In
past
years,
the Implied
Consent
warning
has gone
through
many
changes
due to
successful
challenges
in court
by defense
attorneys. In State
v.
Leviner,
213
Ga.App.
99
(1994),
the court
struck
down
the
warning
as misleading,
inaccurate
and contained
extraneous
information. The
warning
was changed
after
a challenge
by an
out-of-state
driver
where
the warning
was deficient
on independent
testing
in State
v.
Causey,
215
Ga.App.
85
(1994). Out-of-state
drivers
also
won
challenges
in State
v.
Coleman,
216
Ga.App.
598
(1995) and State
v.
Deckard,
210
Ga.App.
421
(1993).
The
proposed
statute
is Code
Section
40-5-202(c). If
passed,
this
Section
would
undoubtedly
be challenged
in the
courts.
This
Bill
has passed
in the
Senate
and is
now in
House
Second
Readers. To
view
the entire
Bill,
go to: www.legis.state.ga.us/legis/2005_06/fulltext/sb502.htm.
Probable
Cause
Cases:
State
v. Sanders,
274 Ga.
App.
393 (2005)
Sanders
displayed
glassy
eyes,
an odor
of alcohol,
admitted
drinking,
failed
field
sobriety
tests
and
tested
positive
on the
alco-sensor.
Conversely,
Sanders
speech
was
normal
and
the
arresting
officer
observed
no impaired
driving
ability.
The
trial
court’s
suppression
of the
state-administered
breath
test
due
to lack
of probable
cause
to arrest
was
affirmed
by the
Court
of Appeals.
State
v. Ellison,
271
Ga. App.
898 (2005)
Ellison
was
stopped
at a
roadblock,
had
a strong
odor
of alcohol,
red,
bloodshot,
watery
eyes,
stumbled
while
exiting
his
vehicle
and
admitted
drinking.
The
trial
court
suppressed
the
state-administered
breath
test,
finding
a lack
of probable
cause
to arrest.
The
Court
of Appeals
upheld
the
trial
court’s
decision.
State
v. Gray,
267 Ga.
App. 753
(2004)
Gray
was
involved
in a
single-car
traffic
accident.
She
exhibited
bloodshot
eyes,
appeared
dazed,
was
unsteady
on her
feet,
and
tested
positive
on the
alco-sensor.
The
Court
of Appeals
upheld
the
trial
court’s
ruling
stating
that;
“[b]ecause
none
of these
factors
addressed
whether
Gray’s
intoxication
impaired
her
so that
she
was
rendered
a less
safe
driver,
the
trial
court
concluded
that
no probable
cause
supported
the
arrest
and
granted
the
motion.”
Implied
Consent:
Howell
v. State,
266 Ga.
App. 480
(2004)
Howell
was
placed
under
arrest
and
read
the
Georgia
Implied
Consent
notice.
Howell
refused
to submit
to the
State-administered
chemical
test
of his
breath.
He was
taken
to the
station,
placed
in front
of the
breath
testing
device
and
told
to blow.
He registered
a .179
and
.180.
The
Court
of Appeals
held:
“[Howell]
was
thus
administered
a breath
test
simply
because
he did
not
refuse
to cooperate.”
The
trial
court’s
decision
was
reversed
and
the
breath
test
was
suppressed.
If you
would like
to get the
process
started
with your
case, please
complete
the DUI
Case Questionnaire.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
The
web site
winglerlaw.com
is provided
by Jamie
S. Wingler,
Attorney
at Law,
to be
used for
informational
purposes
only.
The information
is not
guaranteed
to be
timely
or accurate.
Contact
through
this web
site does
not constitute
an attorney-client
relationship.
Case examples
or results
mentioned
on this
web site
are not
a guarantee
of the
outcome
in your
case.
Please
schedule
an appointment
for the
most accurate
and up-to-date
information
concerning
your DUI
case.
|
|
|
|
|
|